Turkish vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,479,034 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.848. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.338% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 338.4 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $78,960, a difference of 49.2%), per capita income ($52,391 compared to $35,546, a difference of 47.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,318 compared to $74,847, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $51,949, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 68.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 66.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.89%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 36.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 100.5%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 98.0%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 89.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 75.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 68.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.4%).