Hungarian vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hungarians

Creek

Good
Fair
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Hungarian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,734,038 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.514. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to a decrease of 11.4 Creek.
Hungarian Integration in Creek Communities

Hungarian vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $78,960, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,544 compared to $74,847, a difference of 30.3%), and median household income ($86,920 compared to $67,715, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $45,371, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $33,437, a difference of 18.2%).
Hungarian vs Creek Income
Income MetricHungarianCreek
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,426
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,609
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Good
$86,920
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,795
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,309
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,510
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,247
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,544
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,913
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,673
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
27.1%

Hungarian vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 35.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 35.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.8%).
Hungarian vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricHungarianCreek
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Good
13.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.1%

Hungarian vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Hungarian vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHungarianCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Hungarian vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Hungarian vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHungarianCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.8%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Tragic
77.7%

Hungarian vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.70%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hungarian vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHungarianCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
37.6%

Hungarian vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 10.5%).
Hungarian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHungarianCreek
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.5%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.2%

Hungarian vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.7%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 48.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Hungarian vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricHungarianCreek
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.5%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.3%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Hungarian vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.9%).
Hungarian vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricHungarianCreek
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%