Jordanian vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Jordanians

Creek

Exceptional
Fair
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Jordanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,597,620 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 19.3 Creek.
Jordanian Integration in Creek Communities

Jordanian vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $78,960, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($91,794 compared to $67,715, a difference of 35.6%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $82,560, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $45,371, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $51,949, a difference of 23.8%).
Jordanian vs Creek Income
Income MetricJordanianCreek
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,605
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,865
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,794
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,632
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,500
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,464
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,796
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,186
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,376
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,313
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
27.1%

Jordanian vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 58.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 55.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 23.2%).
Jordanian vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricJordanianCreek
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%

Jordanian vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.1%).
Jordanian vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJordanianCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Jordanian vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Jordanian vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJordanianCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.4%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
77.7%

Jordanian vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 31.7%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Jordanian vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJordanianCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
65.5%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
37.6%

Jordanian vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Jordanian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJordanianCreek
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%

Jordanian vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 57.1%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Jordanian vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricJordanianCreek
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.2%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.3%

Jordanian vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.7%).
Jordanian vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricJordanianCreek
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%