French vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,202,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 28.0 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $78,960, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,665 compared to $74,847, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $82,560, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $45,371, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $51,949, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.2%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 41.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (18.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.0%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.43%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.2%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.4%).