Cambodian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,835,581 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.922% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 1,921.9 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $35,546, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $78,960, a difference of 44.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,148 compared to $74,847, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $45,371, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $51,949, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 68.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 63.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 40.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 90.7%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 90.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 72.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.0%).