Immigrants from Caribbean vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,553,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to an increase of 0.0 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 33.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $45,371, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $33,437, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,193 compared to $46,594, a difference of 0.87%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $82,560, a difference of 0.92%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $39,648, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 50.8%), and receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.43%), poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and female poverty (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.2%), currently married (41.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 152.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 62.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 50.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 77.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.25%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.4%).