Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ghana

Creek

Poor
Fair
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,132,248 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 15.5 Creek.
Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Creek Communities

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($81,489 compared to $67,715, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $78,960, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $46,594, a difference of 11.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $51,949, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.1%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,131
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,544
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,489
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,641
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,836
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,894
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,333
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,760
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,982
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,624
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
77.7%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.0%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.7%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
37.6%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 113.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 35.6%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.4%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.2%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.0%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 42.6%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.36%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.7%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.8%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 70.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GhanaCreek
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%