Guatemalan vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,495,380 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 14.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $67,715, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $46,594, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($41,205 compared to $39,648, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $51,949, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.71%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 111.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%).