Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,321,068 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 99.0 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $35,546, a difference of 52.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,930 compared to $78,960, a difference of 49.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($111,676 compared to $74,847, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $45,371, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($44,366 compared to $33,437, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 63.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 58.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.3%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.57%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 100.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 91.1%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 67.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.0%).