Immigrants from South America vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,645,366 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,611 compared to $67,715, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $74,847, a difference of 25.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,126 compared to $78,960, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $51,949, a difference of 13.9%), and median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $46,594, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 43.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.7%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.50%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.6%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.6%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.18%), high school diploma (87.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 69.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 64.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.9%).