Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Creek

Good
Fair
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,804,792 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 95.6 Creek.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Creek Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $78,960, a difference of 31.2%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $67,715, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $82,560, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $45,371, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $51,949, a difference of 19.3%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 41.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 16.3%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
77.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
37.6%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.2%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 64.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 62.9%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaCreek
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%