Immigrants from Russia vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,405,100 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 37.7 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $35,546, a difference of 46.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $74,847, a difference of 45.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $78,960, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $45,371, a difference of 23.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $51,949, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 61.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 57.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 38.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 94.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 95.1%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 87.2%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 84.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 71.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.2%).