Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from El Salvador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from El Salvador

Creek

Fair
Fair
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,523,616 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Creek.
Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Creek Communities

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $45,371, a difference of 20.3%), median household income ($81,213 compared to $67,715, a difference of 19.9%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $46,594, a difference of 3.0%), median earnings ($42,413 compared to $39,648, a difference of 7.0%), and per capita income ($38,394 compared to $35,546, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Income
Income MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,394
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,545
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,213
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,413
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,973
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,673
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,599
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,913
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,176
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,226
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.1%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.1%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty (15.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.1%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.6%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
77.7%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.20, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.3%), births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (67.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
67.0%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.1%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
37.6%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.6%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 136.6%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.3%), nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.6%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.4%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 69.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 58.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.0%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCreek
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%