Immigrants from Grenada vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,570,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 67.8%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $33,437, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $45,371, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $51,949, a difference of 2.4%), median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $46,594, a difference of 7.9%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $82,560, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 54.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 49.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 54.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 381.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 162.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 141.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 103.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 141.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 68.1%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 99.3%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 69.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.3%).