Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Creek

Poor
Fair
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,554,489 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Creek.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Creek Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $74,847, a difference of 19.8%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $67,715, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $51,949, a difference of 4.0%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $46,594, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $39,648, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
77.7%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Tragic
37.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 206.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 69.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 43.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
7.2%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 88.2%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.94%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 76.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 57.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCreek
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%