Yakama vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Creek

Poor
Fair
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,854,694 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.343% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 343.2 Creek.
Yakama Integration in Creek Communities

Yakama vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,992 compared to $78,960, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,354 compared to $33,437, a difference of 0.25%), median earnings ($39,107 compared to $39,648, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $82,560, a difference of 1.7%).
Yakama vs Creek Income
Income MetricYakamaCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Yakama vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 58.5%), receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 51.5%), and married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.79%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Yakama vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaCreek
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
14.1%

Yakama vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 136.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 81.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.7%).
Yakama vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
5.8%

Yakama vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.86%).
Yakama vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
77.7%

Yakama vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.9%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (44.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 7.4%).
Yakama vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Tragic
37.6%

Yakama vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 79.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.7%).
Yakama vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaCreek
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
7.2%

Yakama vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 116.7%), bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and associate's degree (32.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Yakama vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Yakama vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.91%).
Yakama vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricYakamaCreek
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%