Argentinean vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,857,659 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 13.4 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $35,546, a difference of 40.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $78,960, a difference of 39.4%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $67,715, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.52%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.4%), and median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $33,437, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 57.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 25.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 91.4%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 72.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 80.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.1%).