Swiss vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,399,526 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.207% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 207.2 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $78,960, a difference of 30.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $74,847, a difference of 27.6%), and median household income ($85,681 compared to $67,715, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $33,437, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 51.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 50.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.9%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.8%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.96%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 45.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.4%).