Fijian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,654,555 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.778. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 49.4 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $45,371, a difference of 10.5%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $67,715, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,193 compared to $39,648, a difference of 1.4%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $46,594, a difference of 2.2%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $35,546, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 26.5%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 16.4%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.3%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.48%), bachelor's degree (28.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.2%).