Immigrants from Laos vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,634,859 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 53.3 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($78,327 compared to $67,715, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $78,960, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $74,847, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $46,594, a difference of 5.6%), per capita income ($37,857 compared to $35,546, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $39,648, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 31.8%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.1%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.1%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 37.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.1%).