Soviet Union vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Soviet Union

Creek

Good
Fair
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Soviet Union Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,678,295 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.268% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to an increase of 267.9 Creek.
Soviet Union Integration in Creek Communities

Soviet Union vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $35,546, a difference of 52.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,457 compared to $74,847, a difference of 44.9%), and median family income ($119,262 compared to $82,560, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $51,949, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $45,371, a difference of 22.0%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Income
Income MetricSoviet UnionCreek
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,202
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,262
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,098
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,290
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,382
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,556
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,340
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,457
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,008
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,848
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.2%
Tragic
27.1%

Soviet Union vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 64.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 57.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.1%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricSoviet UnionCreek
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Soviet Union vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.29%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSoviet UnionCreek
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Soviet Union vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSoviet UnionCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
77.7%

Soviet Union vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.0%), births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 42.8%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.47%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSoviet UnionCreek
Family Households
Tragic
60.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
24.8%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.2%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.3%
Tragic
37.6%

Soviet Union vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 124.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 62.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 54.5%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSoviet UnionCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.7%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Exceptional
7.2%

Soviet Union vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 112.1%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 95.3%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.24%), 10th grade (94.6% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricSoviet UnionCreek
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.1%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.1%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Soviet Union vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 82.6%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.3%).
Soviet Union vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricSoviet UnionCreek
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%