Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Portugal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Portugal

Creek

Poor
Fair
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,279,510 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 105.4 Creek.
Immigrants from Portugal Integration in Creek Communities

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $74,847, a difference of 27.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $78,960, a difference of 25.6%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $67,715, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $51,949, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $46,594, a difference of 18.4%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,412
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,984
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Average
$84,740
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Good
$47,304
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,182
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,788
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,105
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,512
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,203
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,924
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 46.4%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.90%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.2%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Average
13.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
77.7%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.8%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.53%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.2%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
37.6%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 17.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.4%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.2%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 0.67%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.9%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.2%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PortugalCreek
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%