Immigrants from Australia vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,953,855 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.481% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 481.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $35,546, a difference of 63.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $74,847, a difference of 54.9%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $82,560, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $45,371, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $51,949, a difference of 33.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 65.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 60.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 41.1%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 123.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 108.1%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 98.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 74.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.1%).