Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Creek
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,887,673 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Creek.
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 21.4%), householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $51,949, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $45,371, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $33,437, a difference of 0.44%), median household income ($68,461 compared to $67,715, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $35,546, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,910 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $78,249 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,461 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,426 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $43,461 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,291 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,374 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,701 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $80,662 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,735 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 72.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 63.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty (16.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and poverty (14.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.9% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 77.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 10.3%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households (68.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.2% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 72.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.2% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.5% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 74.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Creek |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Fair 12.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |