Central American vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,342,157 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 17.4%), median household income ($78,803 compared to $67,715, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $45,371, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $46,594, a difference of 3.2%), median earnings ($42,280 compared to $39,648, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $51,949, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and female poverty (16.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.090%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (66.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 107.3%), master's degree (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (52.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.8%).