Spanish vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,034,448 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Spanish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish corresponds to an increase of 8.5 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($99,977 compared to $110,011, a difference of 10.0%), median household income ($83,343 compared to $90,618, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,554 compared to $106,849, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,813 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.88%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and median male earnings ($53,576 compared to $56,302, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.2%), receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 18.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 24.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%).