Japanese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,112,013 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $45,804, a difference of 14.9%), householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.7%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $110,011, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $40,798, a difference of 5.9%), and median earnings ($44,825 compared to $48,229, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.8%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 93.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.7%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.5%).