Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Moroccan
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Moroccans
Zimbabweans
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Moroccan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,474,970 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.267% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 267.0 Zimbabweans.
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $106,849, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,854 compared to $45,804, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.35%), and median earnings ($48,838 compared to $48,229, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,854 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,488 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,468 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,838 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,499 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,872 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,256 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,117 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,138 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,683 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.0%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.33%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.7% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.78%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (61.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.22 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.8% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 62.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 27.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 48.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Good 6.4% |
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (40.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 48.2% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.5% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.4%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Moroccan | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |