Immigrants from Brazil vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,557,209 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 7.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $65,854, a difference of 5.6%), and per capita income ($48,164 compared to $45,804, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,907 compared to $90,618, a difference of 0.32%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $106,849, a difference of 0.36%), and median family income ($109,418 compared to $110,011, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.070%), single female poverty (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.77%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.9%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.7%), college, under 1 year (66.9% compared to 69.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and college, 1 year or more (61.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%).