Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,025,035 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 177.7 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $45,804, a difference of 11.2%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $56,302, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $98,586, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.93%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $65,854, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.14%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.1%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%).