Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Barbadian
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Barbadians
Zimbabweans
1,346
SOCIAL INDEX
11.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
313th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Barbadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,137,136 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 117.0 Zimbabweans.
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $65,854, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $106,849, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $40,798, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $48,229, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,406 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,919 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $79,664 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,846 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,236 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,261 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,202 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,565 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,266 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,163 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 74.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.8%).
Poverty Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 45.4%), male unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.8% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.3%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (62.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 62.5% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.4% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.6% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.0% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 188.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 64.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 23.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 61.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 74.0% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 38.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.6% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.9% | Good 6.4% |
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.94%).
Education Level Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.7% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.0% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.1% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.7%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Disability Metric | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |