Immigrants from Australia vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,863,658 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $45,804, a difference of 26.5%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $56,302, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $98,586, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $65,854, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $51,259, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.55%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.8%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.3%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.69%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%).