Ottawa vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,827,579 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.192% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to an increase of 191.8 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,984 compared to $90,618, a difference of 27.7%), median family income ($86,380 compared to $110,011, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,953 compared to $106,849, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $51,259, a difference of 8.2%), and median male earnings ($46,611 compared to $56,302, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 46.6%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.6%), master's degree (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 49.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 40.0%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.97%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.8%).