Central American vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Central American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Central Americans

Zimbabweans

Poor
Exceptional
1,952
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
278th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Central American Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,768,492 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Zimbabweans.
Central American Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Central American vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($91,087 compared to $110,011, a difference of 20.8%), per capita income ($38,560 compared to $45,804, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $106,849, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $40,798, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.9%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,560
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,087
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,803
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,280
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,093
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,492
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,626
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,144
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,321
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.1%
Fair
26.3%

Central American vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 65.2%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.47%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Excellent
16.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Central American vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Central American vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
84.0%

Central American vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.0%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
66.0%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Central American vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.97%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Good
6.4%

Central American vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 96.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.0%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Central American vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.97%).
Central American vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricCentral AmericanZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%