Asian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,912,379 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 0.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $98,586, a difference of 14.3%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $56,302, a difference of 13.4%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $90,618, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $65,854, a difference of 4.5%), and median family income ($119,955 compared to $110,011, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.91%), male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.5%), currently married (48.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.4%).