Native/Alaskan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,653,656 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 35.3 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $45,804, a difference of 37.6%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $110,011, a difference of 36.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $106,849, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,259, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $40,798, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 100.7%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 82.9%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 24.4%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 38.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 70.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 67.8%), and male unemployment (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 49.8%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.20, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 78.4%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 75.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 65.1%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.3%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.6%).