African vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Africans

Zimbabweans

Tragic
Exceptional
624
SOCIAL INDEX
3.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
341st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,307,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Zimbabweans.
African Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

African vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,925 compared to $106,849, a difference of 25.8%), median family income ($87,820 compared to $110,011, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $98,586, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $51,259, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $40,798, a difference of 11.7%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.7%).
African vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricAfricanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,785
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,820
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,650
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,955
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,994
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,530
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,838
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,986
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,925
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,711
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Fair
26.3%

African vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 59.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.8%), single male poverty (14.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father poverty (18.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.5%).
African vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricAfricanZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

African vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.7%), male unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
African vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAfricanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

African vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
African vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAfricanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
84.0%

African vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 38.4%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
African vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAfricanZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

African vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.4%).
African vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAfricanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.8%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Good
6.4%

African vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
African vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricAfricanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Poor
95.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.0%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

African vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 29.9%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%).
African vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricAfricanZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.9%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Fair
3.0%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%