Sioux vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sioux

Zimbabweans

Fair
Exceptional
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Sioux Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,977,802 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 31.7 Zimbabweans.
Sioux Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $45,804, a difference of 35.0%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $90,618, a difference of 33.7%), and median family income ($82,386 compared to $110,011, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $51,259, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $40,798, a difference of 16.4%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSiouxZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,921
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,386
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,792
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,448
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,566
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,063
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,417
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,089
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,750
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,509
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.3%
Fair
26.3%

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 113.2%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 103.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.3%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSiouxZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.6%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
22.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
9.5%

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 93.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.0%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.1%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSiouxZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 6.6%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSiouxZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.54%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.20, a difference of 9.9%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSiouxZimbabwean
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.52
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
28.7%

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.4%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSiouxZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.8%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
6.4%

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 66.0%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSiouxZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.4%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.0%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Sioux vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSiouxZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.7%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%