Subsaharan African vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,730 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 13.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $106,849, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($93,748 compared to $110,011, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $98,586, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $51,259, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $48,229, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.31%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.2%).