Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Soviet Union

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Soviet Union Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,011,281 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.224% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to an increase of 223.7 Zimbabweans.
Soviet Union Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $45,804, a difference of 18.3%), median female earnings ($46,556 compared to $40,798, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $56,302, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $65,854, a difference of 4.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,008 compared to $106,849, a difference of 4.8%), and median household income ($95,098 compared to $90,618, a difference of 4.9%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,202
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,262
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,098
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,290
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,382
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,556
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,340
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,457
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,008
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,848
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.2%
Fair
26.3%

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.27%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and family households with children (24.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
60.9%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.3%
Exceptional
28.7%

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 92.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 42.9%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.7%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Good
6.4%

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.3%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.1%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.1%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.80%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Soviet Union vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSoviet UnionZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%