Belizean vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Belizean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Belizeans

Zimbabweans

Tragic
Exceptional
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Belizean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,369,355 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.167% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 167.2 Zimbabweans.
Belizean Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 23.9%), median family income ($90,880 compared to $110,011, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $65,854, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.32%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $40,798, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $48,229, a difference of 12.9%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,097
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,880
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,028
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,702
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,358
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,429
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,094
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,534
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,684
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,580
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.2%
Fair
26.3%

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 60.5%), receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Average
16.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.5%

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and male unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
84.0%

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 29.1%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
Family Households
Excellent
64.8%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.39
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.0%
Exceptional
28.7%

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.1%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Good
6.4%

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.6%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Belizean vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricBelizeanZimbabwean
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%