Belizean vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Belizean
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Belizeans
Zimbabweans
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Belizean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,369,355 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.167% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 167.2 Zimbabweans.
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 23.9%), median family income ($90,880 compared to $110,011, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $65,854, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.32%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $40,798, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $48,229, a difference of 12.9%).
Income Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,097 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,880 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,028 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,702 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,358 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,429 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,094 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,534 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,684 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,580 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 60.5%), receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.4% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and male unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.1% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.8% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 29.1%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Excellent 64.8% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.39 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.2% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.0% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.0% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.6% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Good 6.4% |
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.6% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Belizean vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Belizean | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.4% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |