Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Zimbabweans
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,827,353 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.242% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 242.5 Zimbabweans.
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $56,302, a difference of 15.3%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $45,804, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $98,586, a difference of 0.79%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.6%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Fair 26.3% |
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 65.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.59%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 184.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 95.2%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 46.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.92%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.2%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Good 6.4% |
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 104.8%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 65.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.5%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |