Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Zimbabweans

Average
Exceptional
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,827,353 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.242% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 242.5 Zimbabweans.
Tsimshian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $56,302, a difference of 15.3%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $45,804, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $98,586, a difference of 0.79%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.6%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Fair
26.3%

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 65.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.59%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 184.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 95.2%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
84.0%

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 46.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.92%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
28.7%

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.2%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.4%

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 104.8%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 65.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.5%).
Tsimshian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%