Swedish vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,912,834 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Zimbabweans.
Swedish Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 11.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $65,854, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,750 compared to $45,804, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $106,849, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,136 compared to $98,586, a difference of 0.56%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSwedishZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Fair
26.3%

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.85%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
84.0%

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%), currently married (50.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple households (49.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.2%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishZimbabwean
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Exceptional
28.7%

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.5%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
6.4%

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.9%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.3%

Swedish vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.3%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Swedish vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSwedishZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%