South African vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,135,202 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.965. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.969% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 969.2 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $45,804, a difference of 9.3%), median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $56,302, a difference of 9.2%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.31%), and median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.9%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.8%).