Bermudan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,085,611 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.579% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 578.8 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $106,849, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($45,593 compared to $48,229, a difference of 5.8%), and per capita income ($42,911 compared to $45,804, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.20%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 23.8%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and married-couple households (42.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.070%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%).