Pueblo vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,422,851 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($76,880 compared to $110,011, a difference of 43.1%), per capita income ($32,012 compared to $45,804, a difference of 43.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $98,586, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $51,259, a difference of 13.9%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $65,854, a difference of 24.4%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $40,798, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 172.5%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 117.8%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 110.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 31.7%), single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and single father poverty (21.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 77.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 71.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 87.0%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and currently married (38.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.5%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.2%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 72.5%), bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 69.5%), and associate's degree (34.0% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.8%), hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.1%).