Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Marshallese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Marshallese

Zimbabweans

Fair
Exceptional
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Marshallese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 3,089,971 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to a decrease of 12.4 Zimbabweans.
Marshallese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,455 compared to $106,849, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $98,586, a difference of 18.0%), and per capita income ($39,108 compared to $45,804, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.030%), householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $40,798, a difference of 11.9%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,108
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,293
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,930
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,969
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,137
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,459
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,627
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,575
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,455
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,874
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.4%
Fair
26.3%

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.2%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 49.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.3%
Exceptional
84.0%

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 21.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.50%), currently married (45.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.38
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.5%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.5%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.3%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
6.4%

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 53.2%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.0%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Marshallese vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricMarshalleseZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%