Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scotch-Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scotch-Irish

Zimbabweans

Average
Exceptional
5,433
SOCIAL INDEX
51.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
176th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Scotch-Irish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,873,094 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 16.1 Zimbabweans.
Scotch-Irish Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($80,972 compared to $90,618, a difference of 11.9%), householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.8%), and median family income ($99,591 compared to $110,011, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $51,259, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $56,302, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($44,924 compared to $48,229, a difference of 7.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,563
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,591
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,972
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Poor
$44,924
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,658
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,383
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,039
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,969
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,073
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,447
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Fair
26.3%

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.69%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
84.0%

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.9%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
28.7%

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.5%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.4%

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 23.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.8%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.9%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.3%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.3%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricScotch-IrishZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%