Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ghana

Zimbabweans

Poor
Exceptional
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,632,962 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.9%), median family income ($96,544 compared to $110,011, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $106,849, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($45,641 compared to $48,229, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,131
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,544
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,489
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,641
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,836
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,894
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,333
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,760
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,982
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,624
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.56%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.7%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.7%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 83.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.4%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.2%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.8%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GhanaZimbabwean
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%