Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,568,951 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 20.5%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $51,259, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.10%), median household income ($89,640 compared to $90,618, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $65,854, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.1%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.80%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%).